Ticket #645 (assigned Issue)

Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

Reviewing and quality control of questionnaire results

Reported by: sarah Owned by: charlotte
Priority: major Milestone: V1.2 Questionnaire release
Component: WP6 - CMIP5 Questionnaire Version:
Keywords: quality Cc:
Requirement:

Description (last modified by sarah) (diff)

• Review cycle – who reviews, what timescales modellers can expect.

• Human checking of the questionnaire – how do we do it? Part of the CMIP5 support problem. People always fill out metadata inappropriately (mostly by accident) – procedural problem for CMIP5. We need to have a conversation about this with CMIP5.

• Quality control of data and metadata not defined as yet by CMIP5. Whatever we do has to be clear and transparent.

• Human matching step will have to happen when new model names get added to the questionnaire/DRS. Quality control to check consistency of metadata (in questionnaire and netcdf files) and data.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by sarah

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by sarah

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by charlotte

  • Status changed from new to assigned

Quality control of data and metadata is ticket #653 but I think it is out of scope.

comment:4 Changed 3 years ago by bryan

  • Keywords quality added
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.