Ticket #645 (assigned Issue)
Reviewing and quality control of questionnaire results
|Reported by:||sarah||Owned by:||charlotte|
|Priority:||major||Milestone:||V1.2 Questionnaire release|
|Component:||WP6 - CMIP5 Questionnaire||Version:|
Description (last modified by sarah) (diff)
• Review cycle – who reviews, what timescales modellers can expect.
• Human checking of the questionnaire – how do we do it? Part of the CMIP5 support problem. People always fill out metadata inappropriately (mostly by accident) – procedural problem for CMIP5. We need to have a conversation about this with CMIP5.
• Quality control of data and metadata not defined as yet by CMIP5. Whatever we do has to be clear and transparent.
• Human matching step will have to happen when new model names get added to the questionnaire/DRS. Quality control to check consistency of metadata (in questionnaire and netcdf files) and data.